Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: Random thoughts
Is it just me, or have we gotten a lot more active (a lot more new users) here since OOo 3 shipped? I suppose even if we have gotten busier here, it could be simply a coincidence.
Smokey _________________ "[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
I have been wondering the same thing. But from handling the many support requests, I get the sense that we might be seeing a lot of new Mac users as a result of the global economic meltdown. Since I have been seeing quite a few questions for PowerPC Macs, my current theory is that many people with a Mac as their home machine are starting to use their existing Mac to write their resume, start their consulting business, etc. Of course, that is just a wild guess on my part.
One other possible source of new users is that some organizations are experimenting with NeoOffice as possible replacement for Microsoft Office. Although I do not believe that NeoOffice and OpenOffice.org are direct replacements for Microsoft Office (I tend to think of them more as equals to AppleWorks and Microsoft Works), many organizations are looking to trim costs by looking at ways to reduce the number of Microsoft Office licenses that they must buy.
Joined: Jun 20, 2006 Posts: 2051 Location: Midwest, USA
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject:
This is tangential, but I keep an eye on the Mac forum over at the OpenOffice.org Community Forums, and I've seen at least a half a dozen different people comment that they are returning to NeoOffice from OOo 3.0 because of crashing or other performance issues with OOo 3.0. I haven't been able to tell whether those are mainly PPC users or not. I do know that the most active volunteer in that forum has not had these kinds of problems, so it is not a universal experience with OOo 3.0 for Mac.
The folks returning to NeoOffice, of course, wouldn't be likely to account for the uptick here, since they all have already been NeoOffice users. But it's possible that other Mac users have seen those posts and decided to give NeoOffice a try. On a few occasions, Mac users there have indicated that they had never heard of NeoOffice before someone else in the forums mentioned it, and they were excited to give it a try.
I'd quite forgotten about the possible economic causes; the uptick in layoffs also came at about the same time as OOo 3. Certainly a number of interesting possibilities out there.
Lorinda wrote:
This is tangential
Speaking of tangential, congratulations on becoming our latest "Agent Smith"; I seem to have missed that over the past week.
Smokey _________________ "[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
Joined: May 25, 2003 Posts: 4752 Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject:
One interesting stat that I have seen recently was the increase in market share in small business. If that is true, and assuming it's safe to assume that the total number of small businesses isn't increasing dramatically, perhaps that could be a source.
Joined: Jul 05, 2005 Posts: 685 Location: North West England
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:16 am Post subject:
Although NeoOffice is deliberately careful not to bill itself as a substitute for MS Office, there are many users who use only a subset of MS Office's capabilities in each of its modules for whom NeoOffice or OOo is a practical and affordable replacement. They are happy to do without some of the extra features of MS Office or to work with clunkier solutions.
I wonder if there may not also be a kind of snowball effect where a relatively small user base reaches a point where it is suddenly much more visible in search engines, on forums etc. and there is then a higher number of people trying NeoO either for that reason or because they've picked up on the OOo 3 hype and are trying NeoO as well/instead.
One interesting stat that I have seen recently was the increase in market share in small business. If that is true, and assuming it's safe to assume that the total number of small businesses isn't increasing dramatically, perhaps that could be a source.
Actually, I remember reading a story somewhere that Mac sales to small businesses have jumped (doubled or something in that order) in recent months. Given that everyone needs an office suite, that would explain why more small business people are trying NeoOffice.
It will be interesting to see how NeoOffice 3 pans out. I have seen quite a few questions on OOo 3 features in NeoOffice, which leads me to assume these people tried OOo 3 Aqua and weren't completely satisfied with it. These people may well flock to NeoOffice 3 when it comes out.
One step beyond that, I haven't seen much data on how OpenOffice 3 has been received and compared to MS Office Vista (2007/2008). If OOo3 gets decent traction, the current userbase of NeoOffice may yet provide a critical seed mass, in which case we will be in for a very busy time on these fora, come springtime..
In all honesty, I have been very impressed how the support mechanism for NeoOffice has kept pace with the growing userbase.
Best wishes,
Oscar _________________ "What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Joined: Jan 04, 2005 Posts: 36 Location: Planet Earth
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject:
Don't sell yourself short. Although you are correct that, feature for feature, they aren't quite direct replacements for M$ Office, NeoOffice and OOo are far superior to either M$ Works or the late lamented AppleWorks. On the Mac side, I'd put them on a par with iWork, although NeoOffice and OOo still have some catching up to do on Impress as it compares to Keynote, but then Keynote might even have a bit of an edge on PowerPoint. That said, I feel there are very few home or educational users who would find NeoOffice or OOo inadequate for their needs, and there are still some tasks I prefer doing in NeoOffice.
pluby wrote:
One other possible source of new users is that some organizations are experimenting with NeoOffice as possible replacement for Microsoft Office. Although I do not believe that NeoOffice and OpenOffice.org are direct replacements for Microsoft Office (I tend to think of them more as equals to AppleWorks and Microsoft Works), many organizations are looking to trim costs by looking at ways to reduce the number of Microsoft Office licenses that they must buy.
Speaking as a 'home user' who has used MS Office in the office (and uses it on the mac at home too, when absolutely necessary), I find Neo does everything that I've ever needed to do in Office - and I find the Neo UI much more user-friendly (the only exception being that damned annoying OOo feature of Calc where you have to tab to another tab on a panel to click on 'Range contains column labels' EVERY damn time... still not part of the API in v3, so not possible to switch it on via macro grmmmbl...)
Joined: Jan 04, 2005 Posts: 36 Location: Planet Earth
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:11 am Post subject:
Agreed, although I do find Word's mail merge function to be a bit more robust. Fortunately, I don't use mail merge very often. In all, I find myself using M$ Office more than I would like simply because it's easiest to use the same thing my students are using.
I teach writing at a community college and because so few of my students have printers, I allow them to e-mail me their assignments. It actually works pretty well because I can grade them on the computer and e-mail them back, so they don't have to decipher my chicken-scratch handwriting. The only major problem is that about 10 of my students use M$ Works. I've successfully gotten a couple of them to make the switch to OOo for Window$. After a brief adjustment period, they seem to like it just fine and I can grade their papers using OOo 3.0 because its commenting feature, like Word's, places the notes in the right margin.
As far as I know, only one or two of my students use Macs. I received a paper from one the other day, who said her computer had died and she was borrowing her brother's iBook for the rest of the semester. The essay was a .odt file, but I have no idea whether she was using OOo or NeoOffice.
Surprisingly, several students I've suggested OOo or NeoOffice to have been reluctant or even intimidated by the idea of downloading and installing a piece of software from the Web. I'm thinking of burning a couple of OOo and NeoOffice installation CDs over the semester break and setting up a disc exchange program for my students. They can trade me a blank CD for one of the burned ones and I'll just make a new copy for the next student who wants it.
yoxi wrote:
Speaking as a 'home user' who has used MS Office in the office (and uses it on the mac at home too, when absolutely necessary), I find Neo does everything that I've ever needed to do in Office - and I find the Neo UI much more user-friendly (the only exception being that damned annoying OOo feature of Calc where you have to tab to another tab on a panel to click on 'Range contains column labels' EVERY damn time... still not part of the API in v3, so not possible to switch it on via macro grmmmbl...)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum