Joined: Sep 09, 2004 Posts: 25 Location: Paris, France
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:22 am Post subject: Is there a plan to move to 1.1.4 codebase?
I just had a look on OpenOffice.org and thay released 1.1.4 a few days ago.
Looking at the release notes, it looks like most of the differences between 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 impact non-specific code. Most of them actually concern Word compatibility and I think this is very important.
Do you plan to move to the 1.1.4 codebase at this point? Have you even had time to look at it? I realize you may have other plans for tonight and tomorrow and maybe the whole of next week, so no hurry and Merry Christmas to you all.
Me I'm going to burn a NeoJ beta and wrap it and put it under the tree
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 9:36 am Post subject: Re: Is there a plan to move to 1.1.4 codebase?
lga wrote:
I just had a look on OpenOffice.org and thay released 1.1.4 a few days ago.
Looking at the release notes, it looks like most of the differences between 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 impact non-specific code. Most of them actually concern Word compatibility and I think this is very important.
Do you plan to move to the 1.1.4 codebase at this point? Have you even had time to look at it? I realize you may have other plans for tonight and tomorrow and maybe the whole of next week, so no hurry and Merry Christmas to you all.
I also saw that yesterday. I am thinking of using the OOo 1.1.4 for the Neo/J 1.1 final release which, if there aren't too many bugs in Neo/J 1.1 Beta, will probably happen in late January or early February.
This will be a good development if it is possible. New bugs aside, it would be nice if Neo/J could stay relatively up to date--time and resources permitting, of course
I also see from Pavel's blog that 1.1.5 could likely contain the support for the OASIS/OOo2.0 document formats, and it would be good to have those in a 1.1.x release of Neo/J (for cross-platform compatability, etc.) before beginning the long road to 2.0, Alphas, etc.
Wow, if we have to wait for 1.1.5 to have compatibility with 2.0 files, I think it would be worth waiting. I suspect-- and this is just a guess, so tell me if I'm wrong, guys-- that Neo/J 2.0 is quite a way's off, which means we'll be relying on the 1.x versions to carry us for a while... So hopefully we'll at least be file compatible with 2.0...
Make sense?
W
sardisson wrote:
This will be a good development if it is possible. New bugs aside, it would be nice if Neo/J could stay relatively up to date--time and resources permitting, of course
I also see from Pavel's blog that 1.1.5 could likely contain the support for the OASIS/OOo2.0 document formats, and it would be good to have those in a 1.1 release of Neo/J (for cross-platform compatability, etc.) before beginning the long road to 2.0, Alphas, etc.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
