| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
grahamperrin
Sentinel
Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grahamperrin
Sentinel
Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Samwise
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 2315
Location: Montpellier, France
|
 Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
While reading http://development.openoffice.org/releases/3.2.1rc2.html I noticed the first paragraph, which mentions some format change affecting extensions' configuration files and backwards compatibility.
Not sure exactly what's affected but I thought it was worth mentioning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
| Samwise wrote: | While reading http://development.openoffice.org/releases/3.2.1rc2.html I noticed the first paragraph, which mentions some format change affecting extensions' configuration files and backwards compatibility.
Not sure exactly what's affected but I thought it was worth mentioning. |
Why on earth would they make incompatible changes in a X.X.1 release? In any case, from NeoOffice's perspective I think this means that we should put the user preference files in a new folder when we move to NeoOffice 3.2.1.
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
grahamperrin
Sentinel
Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 23
Location: Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
