| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
narf
The Anomaly
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 1075
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| sardisson wrote: | Thanks to yakusha for all the fine work so far and all the work yet to come!  |
I would like to echo a "Thank you" to yakusha and add one to Smokey for these latest translations in the NeoWiki.
--fran |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2302
Location: Utrecht, NL
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ziet er heel goed uit  .
Bedankt,
Oscar
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yakusha
Operator
Joined: Oct 03, 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Gent BE
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
thank you all for the kudos
greetz,
_________________
"The mountain doesn't mind which way you climb it" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yakusha
Operator
Joined: Oct 03, 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Gent BE
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:15 am Post subject: NeoLight |
|
|
Hi,
while translating I stumbled on something.
http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoLight#Testing_Your_Installation item 5 isn't happening as described.
Instead of the titlebar of the document it's the titlebar of the dialog window that changes to reflect the entry in the "Title" field.
using NeoOffice 2.2.5 patch 6
greetz,
_________________
"The mountain doesn't mind which way you climb it" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
narf
The Anomaly
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 1075
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks yakusha.
I made the change in the NeoWiki article to read:
| Quote: | | Notice that the title from the Properties dialog appears in the dialog's titlebar. |
Let me know if that change is ok and if you see anything else.
--fran |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sardisson
Town Crier
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4574
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OOo must have fixed that wacky Windows behavior (or Patrick figured out how to fix it, which is more likely!); the behavior used to work as the wiki described (any "Title" metadata was used as the title of the document window, instead of the filename).
Smokey
_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yakusha
Operator
Joined: Oct 03, 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Gent BE
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:06 am Post subject: NeoOffice Early Access FAQ |
|
|
hi,
while translating I stumbled on something that I find a little strange.
NeoWiki | Quote: | | Any donations made on or after 27 March 2007 - the end of the last - until 27 August 2007 - the end of the current Early Access Program - will automatically be counted. |
Official NeoOffice Early Access Program page | Quote: | | Any donations made on or after 27 August 2007 - the end of the last Early Access Program - until 31 March 2009 - the end of the current Early Access Program - will automatically be counted. |
NeoWiki | Quote: | | While it is currently unclear whether we can legally restrict the distribution of NeoOffice binaries obtained under the NeoOffice Early Access Program, we ask that you do not redistribute these binaries to others until after the Early Access Program for the specific binary release has ended (e.g., until 27 August 2007 for NeoOffice 3.0). |
 the date of the last quote from the wiki.
greetz,
_________________
"The mountain doesn't mind which way you climb it" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 10942
Location: California, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:13 am Post subject: Re: NeoOffice Early Access FAQ |
|
|
| yakusha wrote: | hi,
while translating I stumbled on something that I find a little strange.
NeoWiki | Quote: | | Any donations made on or after 27 March 2007 - the end of the last - until 27 August 2007 - the end of the current Early Access Program - will automatically be counted. |
Official NeoOffice Early Access Program page | Quote: | | Any donations made on or after 27 August 2007 - the end of the last Early Access Program - until 31 March 2009 - the end of the current Early Access Program - will automatically be counted. |
NeoWiki | Quote: | | While it is currently unclear whether we can legally restrict the distribution of NeoOffice binaries obtained under the NeoOffice Early Access Program, we ask that you do not redistribute these binaries to others until after the Early Access Program for the specific binary release has ended (e.g., until 27 August 2007 for NeoOffice 3.0). |
the date of the last quote from the wiki.
greetz, |
Which NeoWiki page is that on? Can you post a link and we will update it?
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
narf
The Anomaly
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 1075
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:33 am Post subject: Re: NeoOffice Early Access FAQ |
|
|
| pluby wrote: |
Which NeoWiki page is that on? Can you post a link and we will update it? |
I see this in the NeoOffice Early Access FAQ NeoWiki article. I will go ahead and correct it.
yakusha, did you see date discrepancies regarding the Early Access Program anywhere else in the NeoWiki?
--fran |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sardisson
Town Crier
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4574
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:59 am Post subject: Re: NeoOffice Early Access FAQ |
|
|
| narf wrote: | I see this in the NeoOffice Early Access FAQ NeoWiki article. I will go ahead and correct it.
yakusha, did you see date discrepancies regarding the Early Access Program anywhere else in the NeoWiki? |
I guess I beat you to it The current end date should now be updated wherever it was used, since we have that as a template. Hopefully the only place where we care about the end of the *last* EAP is that page
More dusting...it's been quite a while since we've done an EAP, so it's harder to remember all the things we're supposed to change  Thanks for catching them!
Smokey
_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sardisson
Town Crier
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4574
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, one other question for Patrick: there's a paragraph in there about the "2.x series EAP" for more generous donors; is there going to be an equivalent for Neo 3.x, or should we just hide that paragraph?
And are there any updates you want to make to the statistics section?
Smokey
_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
narf
The Anomaly
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 1075
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:10 pm Post subject: Re: NeoOffice Early Access FAQ |
|
|
| sardisson wrote: | I guess I beat you to it The current end date should now be updated wherever it was used, since we have that as a template. Hopefully the only place where we care about the end of the *last* EAP is that page
|
Yes, you did When I checked the EAP templates I saw you had already been by.
| sardisson wrote: | | More dusting...it's been quite a while since we've done an EAP, so it's harder to remember all the things we're supposed to change Thanks for catching them! |
Thanks Smokey and another thanks to yakusha for noticing this,
--fran |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 10942
Location: California, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sardisson wrote: | | And are there any updates you want to make to the statistics section? |
In general, the statistics section is still mostly accurate. The only real change since that was written is the amount of support effort we do. To me, the wording implies that we are spending 70-80 hours a week on development when, in reality, we are spending more than half on user support. Also, I don't know if this needs to go in there or not, but since narf is now working on NeoOffice almost full time and she is not a developer (her background is Unix system administration and testing), the 70-80 hours is really something like "two people each work 50 to 60 hours every week working on NeoOffice development, bug fixing, and user support".
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
narf
The Anomaly
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 1075
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sardisson wrote: | | Actually, one other question for Patrick: there's a paragraph in there about the "2.x series EAP" for more generous donors; is there going to be an equivalent for Neo 3.x, or should we just hide that paragraph? |
I am not Patrick but I see on the official Early Access Program information there is the same information about a subscription for NeoOffice 3.x EAP. I changed the subscription references in the English NeoWiki article from NeoOffice 2.x EAP to NeoOffice 3.x EAP.
--fran |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sardisson
Town Crier
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4574
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pluby wrote: | | The only real change since that was written is the amount of support effort we do. To me, the wording implies that we are spending 70-80 hours a week on development when, in reality, we are spending more than half on user support. Also, I don't know if this needs to go in there or not, but since narf is now working on NeoOffice almost full time and she is not a developer (her background is Unix system administration and testing), the 70-80 hours is really something like "two people each work 50 to 60 hours every week working on NeoOffice development, bug fixing, and user support". |
I think it's probably worth reworking the wording on that page to reflect the reality of the situation, not only with reference to the personnel, but also to the fact that the nature of NeoOffice "development" has changed since we first wrote that text. NeoOffice is now a very mature, stable product, and most of the obvious points of integration with Mac OS X have been completed (whereas the first EAP was during the big push to Aqua widgets and Intel support). And where else can you get the kind of question/answer (often from the lead developer himself) or bug/fix turn-around time that you find on trinity and in bugzilla--at least among free software programs?
Smokey
_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
