| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:30 am Post subject: Word completion seems to ignore undo/redo |
|
I found another oddity:
I was editing a document and I noticed that when I had word completion suggesting a word, and I hit command-z, the document reverted as it should, but the suggestion from the word completion stayed even if the letters that triggered is were gone.
It disappeared once I did something other than undo/redo keys.
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
I can reproduce this and I will investigate. Since pressing an arrow key deletes the autocompleted text, I assume that our code needs to send some event to the underlying OpenOffice.org code after dispatching the menu shortcut event before it will clear the text.
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
I think that I have fixed this bug and in the following test patch, pressing the Command-Z keys or selecting the Edit :: Undo shortcut should clear any autocompletion text.
Can you install the following test patch and tell us if the bug is fixed for you?:
Intel:
http://sally.neooffice.org/test/NeoOffice-3.3_Beta_2-Patch-0-Test-1-Intel.dmg
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
Not yet. Pressing command-z when an autocomplete is visible still removes the bits that are being autocompleted, but not the suggested part until do something else..
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
| ovvldc wrote: | | Not yet. Pressing command-z when an autocomplete is visible still removes the bits that are being autocompleted, but not the suggested part until do something else.. |
Interesting. My fix only works when I undo the first autocomplete suggestion that appears and it reappears once a second automplete suggestion occurs. Is that what you see? Or does it still occur with the first autocomplete suggestion in a document?
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
For me, autocomplete suggestion never changes when I undo (for clarity: I undo while it is highlighted in blue and I haven't chosen to use it).
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
Surprisingly, I found out that what you are seeing is actually the normal behavior in all Mac OS X versions of OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice. This OpenOffice.org behavior only occurs when the Edit :: Undo menu item is selected via clicking on the menu item or pressing the Command-Z keys.
What is strange is that if the menu item is not selected and the Command-Z key press and release "fall through" to the window itself, the OpenOffice.org code behaves like you expect it.
The reason that you notice the OpenOffice.org menu item behavior in NeoOffice 3.3 Beta 2 is that, for some unknown reason, in NeoOffice 3.2.1 and prior versions, the Java menus ignored Command-Z keys and those keys would always fall through to the window. But, in those Java-based versions, you would see the OpenOffice.org menu item behavior if you selected the Edit :: Undo menu item with the mouse.
I will have to think about this more. Since this is not a critical hanging or crashing bug, I am very reluctant to try messing with the OpenOffice.org menu item code that causes this behavior. But maybe there are some simpler things that I can try if I think about it a bit.
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
That is surprising.
Anyway, it is a cosmetic thing, so feel free to put it on your list of bugs to tackle when you are bored  .
Thanks for investigating.
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
Although the behavior you see is an OpenOffice.org bug, NeoOffice 3.2.1 did not show this bug in most cases so I spent some time trying to find a way to implement the NeoOffice 3.2.1 behavior.
I think that I have found a way. In the following test patch I changed our native menu handling code to dispatch fake key press and released events instead of menu selected events.
Can you install the following test patch and tell us if the OpenOffice.org bug still occurs for you?:
Intel:
http://sally.neooffice.org/test/NeoOffice-3.3_Beta_2-Patch-0-Test-11-Intel.dmg
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi
Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
This seems to have done the trick. Thanks!
_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
FYI. I have included the fix for this bug in NeoOffice 3.3 Beta 2 Patch 1 which you can download from the NeoOffice 3.3 Beta 2 patch download page.
Patrick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pluby
The Architect
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 11949
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
