Welcome to NeoOffice developer notes and announcements
NeoOffice
Developer notes and announcements
 
 

This website is an archive and is no longer active
NeoOffice announcements have moved to the NeoOffice News website


Support
· Forums
· NeoOffice Support
· NeoWiki


Announcements
· Twitter @NeoOffice


Downloads
· Download NeoOffice


  
NeoOffice :: View topic - NeoOffice/J 1.1 official release plans
NeoOffice/J 1.1 official release plans
 
   NeoOffice Forum Index -> NeoOffice Development
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Waldo
Oracle


Joined: Dec 03, 2004
Posts: 239

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:58 pm    Post subject:

As Neo/J is software icon_smile.gif, there will be bugs and fixes, even in a final release, so I'm undecided as to whether the patch-check should be on or off by default in a final release (definitely on in alpha/beta/release candidate). Ray makes a good argument about mass deployment....

My vote is for ON. There will be bugs. People will need to know to fix them.

W
Back to top
OPENSTEP
The One
The One


Joined: May 25, 2003
Posts: 4752
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:41 pm    Post subject:

I still wish that Apple could open up their Software Update mechanism to third party developers. All third parties wind up having to replicate things themselves, like the annoying Microsoft AutoUpdater Wink But that's neither here nor there.

The patch page should be enabled, I would think, esp. for anyone that gets the distro on a CD that doesn't get the patches.

ed
Back to top
val1984
Oracle


Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 229
Location: France

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:42 pm    Post subject:

It may be possible to explain Ray how to change the installation package so that the file that disables patch check is created, no?

Is it easy to do Patrick?
Then we could post the instructions on the wiki and maybe in the read me file Wink
Back to top
rays
The Anomaly
(earlier version)


Joined: Sep 23, 2004
Posts: 475
Location: Geneva, Switzerland

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:09 am    Post subject:

OPENSTEP wrote:
The patch page should be enabled, I would think, esp. for anyone that gets the distro on a CD that doesn't get the patches.

ed


Hmmm... I had been thinking that those who were ordering CDs would be those for whom going online and downloading was an issue, be that of speed or experience etc. Their purpose in ordering a CD might well be motivated by a desire to avoid the whole download and install anything experience.

Patrick has already indicated elsewhere the manner by which the on/off patch check works. Whichever way the decision goes, I hope my suggestion to add a simple menu item with default off should be retained for inclusion in the next round of development leading to NeoOffice/J 1.2 Cool

_________________
Ray Saunders
World Scout Bureau
Back to top
val1984
Oracle


Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 229
Location: France

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:32 am    Post subject:

rays wrote:
Hmmm... I had been thinking that those who were ordering CDs would be those for whom going online and downloading was an issue, be that of speed or experience etc. Their purpose in ordering a CD might well be motivated by a desire to avoid the whole download and install anything experience.

Patchs are quite lightweight compared to the full archive of NeoOffice/J Wink
Back to top
OPENSTEP
The One
The One


Joined: May 25, 2003
Posts: 4752
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:53 pm    Post subject:

And easier on mirror/torrent bandwidth too Smile

ed
Back to top
Waldo
Oracle


Joined: Dec 03, 2004
Posts: 239

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:54 pm    Post subject:

rays wrote:
OPENSTEP wrote:
The patch page should be enabled, I would think, esp. for anyone that gets the distro on a CD that doesn't get the patches.

ed


Hmmm... I had been thinking that those who were ordering CDs would be those for whom going online and downloading was an issue, be that of speed or experience etc. Their purpose in ordering a CD might well be motivated by a desire to avoid the whole download and install anything experience.


I think it's fair to assume a lot of people will install Neo/J from CD without having any clue what site it came from (say the CD was given to them from a friend, sold by a third party, or came in a magazine...)

W
Back to top
sardisson
Town Crier
Town Crier


Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4588

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:42 am    Post subject:

Looks like our timing was good again...there are rumblings of 1.1.5 again Smile (on the other hand, the cws of Patrick's donated code is just sitting there, waiting for Godot--at least it has a 1.1.5 target now....)

I'm grouchy early in the morning Sad

Smokey

_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
Back to top
thulli
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 5:50 am    Post subject:

OPENSTEP wrote:
I still wish that Apple could open up their Software Update mechanism to third party developers. All third parties wind up having to replicate things themselves, like the annoying Microsoft AutoUpdater Wink But that's neither here nor there.

The patch page should be enabled, I would think, esp. for anyone that gets the distro on a CD that doesn't get the patches.

ed


The darwin ports have an "Aqua" section where several open source projects are available (cyberduck among others). I know it's not practical because of lack of a GUI and needed compilation. It would be great Fink to implement something like this : a simple (no dependancy management) apt-get like. Fink has already a GUI.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:24 pm    Post subject:

OPENSTEP wrote:
I still wish that Apple could open up their Software Update mechanism to third party developers. All third parties wind up having to replicate things themselves, like the annoying Microsoft AutoUpdater Wink But that's neither here nor there.

The patch page should be enabled, I would think, esp. for anyone that gets the distro on a CD that doesn't get the patches.

ed


I think they planned to open it up, but backed off because of security concerns.
Back to top
OPENSTEP
The One
The One


Joined: May 25, 2003
Posts: 4752
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:38 pm    Post subject:

sardisson wrote:
is just sitting there, waiting for Godot--at least it has a 1.1.5 target now....)


If it hangs itself I'll start to worry...

ed
Back to top
Unknown User
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:30 pm    Post subject:

Waldo wrote:
...
My vote is for ON. There will be bugs. People will need to know to fix them.

W


Same Vote. I would like the "machine" checking itself, too. No mails pls (just my opinion).

Is there a possibility for the end user to easily delete the "nocheckforupdates" file? If later a Checkforupdates could be added to the help menu (as suggestet by rays) it would be the optimum solution from my point of view.

Regards, Thomas
Back to top
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi


Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:04 pm    Post subject:

I suppose Bittorrent bandwith assistance is as usual? Get the torrent, download the file and then keep it up for sharing for the first week or so, until the first spike dies down at least....

EDIT: I've capped my upload speed at 12 kbytes/sec to keep other channels open, but so far it is zooming along. I hope more people will join in.

Best wishes,
Oscar

P.S. Smokey, is someone at VT checking our work? Are the admins users too, then? In that case they should have given us a highlighted listing.

_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Back to top
sardisson
Town Crier
Town Crier


Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4588

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:26 pm    Post subject:

ovvldc wrote:
P.S. Smokey, is someone at VT checking our work? Are the admins users too, then? In that case they should have given us a highlighted listing.


I put a nasty note at the bottom of the page when I updated their jumped-the-gun listing with the actual, you know, release details. When the replied the changes had been posted to the listing, they noted that the release was announced on www.planamesa.com/neojava. So they are apparently monitoring certain pages for changes and then determining when to update announcements. (Of course, since they are in nuclear war with MacUpdate, MU followed suit).

The moral of the story, for the next lanuch, is for Patrick not to update planamesa.com until night-time in California.

Smokey

_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   NeoOffice Forum Index -> NeoOffice Development All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Planamesa Inc.
NeoOffice is a registered trademark of Planamesa Inc. and may not be used without permission.
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.