Welcome to NeoOffice developer notes and announcements
NeoOffice
Developer notes and announcements
 
 

This website is an archive and is no longer active
NeoOffice announcements have moved to the NeoOffice News website


Support
· Forums
· NeoOffice Support
· NeoWiki


Announcements
· Twitter @NeoOffice


Downloads
· Download NeoOffice


  
NeoOffice :: View topic - Vulgar terminology - help wanted
Vulgar terminology - help wanted
 
   NeoOffice Forum Index -> Random Whatnot
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MrGruff
Operator


Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 45
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:03 pm    Post subject: Vulgar terminology - help wanted

Folks, and North American folks in particular, I need some advice on slang.

I'm writing a play set in 19th century (1844) Ohio (Warren County) and need my characters to refer to sex in terms which are vulgar but not outrightly offensive. The distinction is between, say, 'shag' or 'bonk' and 'f**k'. The character in question would, in the 21st century, use the two former terms when referring to intercourse, but not the latter.

Suggestions (I may regret that Embarassed ) or pointers to on-line sources would be very helpful. I have a deadline of 12th November and a lot of pages still to write.

MrGruff
Back to top
sardisson
Town Crier
Town Crier


Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4588

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:23 pm    Post subject:

What a lovely bunch of corn and soybeans you've chosen as your setting Smile

Sorry, I'm the wrong guy to ask about vulgar language Sad, although otherwise my slang contains a fair helping of Ohioan Smile

Smokey

_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
Back to top
AdamMoore
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:03 am    Post subject:

Think Midwestern Bible belt. especially in that time. So Lie, Have Relations something like that.
Back to top
ovvldc
Captain Naiobi


Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 2352
Location: Zürich, CH

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:14 am    Post subject:

AdamMoore wrote:
Think Midwestern Bible belt. especially in that time. So Lie, Have Relations something like that.


Perhaps something with the word 'carnal' involved?

_________________
"What do you think of Western Civilization?"
"I think it would be a good idea!"
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:58 pm    Post subject:

Perhaps Copulate or Frig?
Back to top
sardisson
Town Crier
Town Crier


Joined: Feb 01, 2004
Posts: 4588

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:52 am    Post subject:

Actually, I suppose the old meaning of "know" is probably relevant, too, given the time period.

Smokey

_________________
"[...] whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant." -- ovvldc and sardisson in the NeoWiki
Back to top
MrGruff
Operator


Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 45
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:40 am    Post subject: Vulgarity

Thanks for those helpful suggestions. I think, given the subject matter of the play (The Great Disappointment - which also explains the location) 'lie with', 'have relations' and 'know' are probably the best way to go.

It looks like there's a gap in the market for a Thesaurus and Dictionary of Nineteenth Century Mild Profanity if anyone is looking for a project (small gap, small market).

Thanks again,

MrGruff
Back to top
yoxi
Cipher


Joined: Sep 07, 2004
Posts: 1799
Location: Dawlish, Devon

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:51 am    Post subject:

If you're looking for mild profanity rather than euphemism, then maybe 'had' is a better word, as though it's not overt, it certainly isn't polite either in the same way that the other terms are.
Or there's the bestial approach, where you use a word like 'tupping' which actually applies to sheep, but everyone knows what you mean (and it's more old-fashioned/bucolic too, but might not work in arable country!)

- yoxi
Back to top
MrGruff
Operator


Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 45
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:11 am    Post subject: meanwhile in Scotland

I could see 'tupping' being used in a derogatory way to refer to a third (and fourth) party's activites.

While I was scouring my vocabulary I also came upon 'towsing' a Scottish dialect word from a slightly earlier period which crops up in Robert Burns' work:

I ance was tied up like a stirk,
For civilly swearing and quaffin;
I ance was abus’d i’ the kirk,
For towsing a lass i’ my daffin.

[daffin = flirting]

The word has connotations of ruffling/rumpling.

Still, with less than a week to go I'm going to have to focus on the rest of the play.

MrGruff
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   NeoOffice Forum Index -> Random Whatnot All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Planamesa Inc.
NeoOffice is a registered trademark of Planamesa Inc. and may not be used without permission.
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.